I'm fairly new to all this, but I notice sound improvements when I hear them. A little background info I started off buying an Onkyo CS micro system and really liked the sound. After seeing 12x32 mobile home floor plans article in Stereophile about Wharfdale Diamond What an improvement to already decent sound! I started to look at a headphone amp to further improve things, and instead spent some cash on a Marantz CD I hooked up the Marantz to the Onkyo via the dock setting and running a cd through this combination has upped sound quality yet again.Nad C326Bee intagrated amp review
I hear things I never knew were there on my favorite cd's! Would anyone be able to give me some advice on how to proceed?
Nad C320 to Marantz PM6005?
I listen mainly to rock, jazz, blues and a little classical and country thrown in for good measure. I would duly appreciate it! Funny how it often works out that way. You can also see that the weight of the units increases with price. This may or may not reflect the robustness of the power supplies in each unit. Any difference in sound between these three choices would be more of a personal preference than anything.
I am biased toward NAD, but the Marantz amps are nice as well. And smoother sounding is not always better sounding, so there you go. Thanks for the comments. Yeah,I've gone through the specs quite a few times, and they are all fairly similar. Build quality is also something I'm looking at, as I want something robust, as I plan on having this a while. I also won't have a chance to demo any of these before buying, I'll be buying blind from the UK and having things shipped down to Spain.
So once I've have things, return will be difficult and expensive. Another unit I would suggest that you consider is the Harman-Kardon ; it is a very good unit, and might be slightly less money. The UK Harmon-Kardon webite sells it for pounds. It has considerably more power and additional features that the does not have. Search form Search. Show Munich More Reports.Menu Menu.
Search Everywhere Threads This forum This thread. Search titles only. Search Advanced search…. Everywhere Threads This forum This thread. Search Advanced…. Log in. New posts Trending Search forums. What's new. New posts New profile posts Latest activity. Current visitors New profile posts Search profile posts Billboard Trophies.
Dec 29, 97 0 0. So you are thinking of changing your amp just to get a phono stage? Phono stages are not that expensive. BigH said:. Jan 18, 0 0. I thought the old was very good when I heard it in a shop many years ago.Original Poster. Search My Stuff What's New 3 12 24 Nad C to Marantz PM? HerrSchnell Original Poster 2, posts months. First time posting in here so please be gentle. I've been listening to a Nad C with some old Mordaunt Short floorstanders for years now but finally got around to switching the speakers for a pair of Q Acoustics s last year and have been enjoying the difference since.
That's now got me wondering about the amp, especially as I now listen mainly to mixcloud through my PC and am thinking it's time to switch the old Nad for something with a DAC built in. I've been told that the Marantz PM is a good partner for the s but am wondering if I'm really going to notice that much of a difference between my faithful old Nad and something new, specificaly the Marantz.
Any thoughts would be appreciated. You could get a usb dac then and keep the old amp. Seems a shame to get rid. I then went to an Arcam A85, which made the BX2s sound great. Be careful. It's a slippery slope! First thing, what's the budget? Second, what sort of sound are you going for? The new direct digital designs have had very good reviews, the D especially.
If you want something smoother then Arcam's amps are always a good call. Thanks both, that's given me things to think about and maybe a straight swap isn't the way to go at all. I listen to what you'd broadly call dance music and do enjoy the thump that the C has but it's not the most versatile sound and these new speakers show it as being a bit muddy and kind of flat at low volumes for the more musical stuff I listen to. I'm thinking maybe just live with the murky sound for now and then come back to it with a bigger budget later in the year if the Marantz isn't going to sound that much better.Log in or Sign up.
Steve Hoffman Music Forums. Another 'which integrated amp' thread Location: Ontario, Canada. I have a specific list of integrateds I am looking at, and want to stay with this list. I currently have a Cambridge Audio Azur a integrated. It does a lot of things right, but overall I find it bright, and a little ragged sounding. I don't like or want bright sound, I prefer a warmer sound, but detailed. I'm in a smaller listening space, well furnished; I'm quite sure it isnt the room creating the brightness.
I have tried a Brio-R, and while it was nice, I found it a little bland and I dont think it had quite enough power. Last edited: Oct 3, Noel PattersonOct 3, Location: Iowa. SpeedMorrisOct 3, Cyclone Ranger likes this. Location: Boston MA. I think it sounds really good and sure is reliable.
It also has a lot of versatility. I can't speak for the other brands, as I have never heard them. TullmanOct 3, SandAndGlass likes this. Would have recommended theas this is the only one I have have experience with.
However, saw this article I kinda liked the As always Good luck with your decision. Location: Kokomo Indiana. I ran the Evo 50 in my system for about a week.
I loved it with my particular speakers. Triangles speakers need to be mated with the proper amp. With the wrong amp, they can be a bit bright. It was perfect. I'm not familiar with your speakers though, so who knows. The Evo just seems to add a life to the music.MORE: Best stereo amplifiers The bluesy instrumentals have more assurance; the epic electric guitar solo ripping through the arrangement has more impassion and soaring pathos, while the Marantz is determined to pull cymbals, bass guitar and drums into your attention span.
Emotional baggage is conveyed, with the focus and clarity to break free of piano and drum accompaniment without sounding astray. The CXA60 takes punch, solidity and detail levels far enough to justify the extra outlay. No such radical step has been taken with the PM With the PM, we expressed our wish for a USB input for a more straightforward connection to a laptop, and that wish remains unfulfilled.
More evolution than revolution, the Marantz PM exists as another solid go-to for someone nailing down their first hi-fi system. It has a clearly improved sound over the impressive PM and a marginally more appealing set of digital connections. Right now, it stands as a stepping stone between the Award-winning Onkyo A and Cambridge amplifiers — and rightly deserves to be in such formidable company.
See all our Marantz reviews. What Hi-Fi? Please deactivate your ad blocker in order to see our subscription offer. Home Reviews. Our Verdict Yet another fine budget amp from Marantz, despite there being room for further digital upgrades.
For Smooth, balanced and insightful delivery Dynamically expressive Phono stage Decent set of digital connections. Against No USB input. Verdict More evolution than revolution, the Marantz PM exists as another solid go-to for someone nailing down their first hi-fi system.Tracing its lineage back to the original NADan amplifier that changed the industry, the C BEE is a truly extraordinary component.
With more than twice the power output, as well as a pure Class A preamp circuit, the C BEE delivers an outstanding performance. Featuring 7 line inputs, and a pre-amplifier section that can be separated from the power amplifier for easy upgrades, the C BEE is a product that cannot be ignored.
Read more of this product's story. Combining the highest levels of audio engineering with an extensive feature list, and more than adequate power for all but the most ambitious systems, the C BEE keeps the concept of affordable hi-end alive and well. An improved tone control circuit and revised PCB layout has reduced distortion and noise to unprecedented levels.
Taken together, these improvements mark a sharp upturn in performance that must be heard to be fully appreciated. Under this Agreement NAD grants you a non-exclusive, non-transferable, non-sublicenseable, royalty-free limited license to use the program or online documentation for use solely for the purpose of upgrading NAD Products.
This license is effective until terminated. You may terminate it at any time by giving NAD written notice to that effect. NAD may terminate it if you fail to comply with this Agreement by giving you notice. Upon termination you will destroy the program or documentation and all copies you have made of them. In addition upon termination you will have no recourse against NAD for your inability to use the program or accompanying documentation.
NAD will not be liable for damages, either direct or consequential, arising from the use of this product or from the inability to use this product, even if we have been informed in advance of the possibility of such damages.
Upgrades, modifications, or repairs to this program or documentation will be strictly at the discretion of NAD. You acknowledge that NAD owns all right, title and interest, including but not limited to all copyrights, trade secrets, and other intellectual property in and to the programs and accompanying documentation.
Sie verlassen die Website von NAD. Andernfalls, wenn Sie auf nadelectronics. You will be leaving the NAD website and we are not responsible for the content or availability of these sites and would ask you to read their security and privacy policies as they may differ from those of NAD.
Otherwise, if you wish to stay on nadelectronics.
Key Features. Control Integration. Crestron Crestron Driver Package. Lutron Lutron Driver Package. OTHER You acknowledge that NAD owns all right, title and interest, including but not limited to all copyrights, trade secrets, and other intellectual property in and to the programs and accompanying documentation.
Please indicate your acceptance by pressing the I Agree button below. Helena St. Product updates. Please select at least one product category from above.
Good headphone quality I use the headphones more than the speakers but I want good quality for both Can anyone tell me which is best for my requirements?
Thanks for the reply.
Marantz PM6006 review
What would you call "the nad sound" then? And how does it compare to the "marantz sound"? If you have owned both and could tell me how they compare that would be extremely helpfull Which has the best bass? Also I had a NAD Voices were too quiet and loud sounds in films were ridiculously loud Maybe the Marantz is more balanced? Last edited: Apr 26, How would you are the sound compared to NAD in terms of : Treble which is the smoothest with least sibilance?
Bass Which has the most Quantity and quality? Overall sound Thanks. Don Dadda Distinguished Member. Nicholars said:. Overall sound.
Another 'which integrated amp' thread...
Couldn't fault the treble, maybe the overly forward mid overshadowed it a little hence why the marantz seem to be more on point with the 'Tings and Pings'. We used a Jazz cd where a section of the track had a shrimmering of symbols and the Marantz claimed the title with that.
My main issue I don't like in sound is Sibilance and over emphasised treble I am a little worried the marantz will be too bright and harsh sounding compared to my old NADBee? Other than that it seems good